Cornerstone Move1 book · 4 highlights

Sell the Company to Itself — Internal Reverse Takeovers

Books Teaching This Pattern

Evidence

  1. “later. In June, 1972, Canada Steamship Lines, Power’s only directly wholly owned subsidiary, bought almost all of Power’s investment portfolio for $145 million. The sale didn’t seem to make sense. For $145 million, csl bought Power’s investments in Dominion Glass Co. Ltd., The Investors Group, Consolidated-Bathurst and the Gesca $19.6-million income debenture. The deal included Trans-Canada Corp. Fund and through it one of its holdings, Shawinigan Industries Ltd., the interests in Laurentide, Argus, Imperial Life and other Power investments. Desmarais had essentially sold Power to itself, accomplishing an internal reverse takeover. Technically, the manoeuvre was a realign¬ ment of assets, because Power didn’t make any profit on the deal. The $145-million purchase price was book value (the value carried on the books computed as total assets less outstanding debt), paid $70.5 million in cash and $74.6 million in promissory notes with 9.5 percent interest, plus a series of debentures staggered to come due at intervals between 1972 and 1992. The sale solved one problem each for Power and csl. One effect was that by transferring some of its debt to csl, Power gave csl a way to reduce its income taxes.”

  2. “Desmarais moved further to reshape Power by acquiring control of Canada Steamship Lines (csl). Here he used the reverse takeover with a twist: he sold a wholly owned subsidiary of Power, Provincial Transport, to CSL, a company in which Power already held a major stake (45.7 percent). The selling price was $17,820,000, of which $3.8 million was cash. The rest was enough csl shares to raise Power’s voting stake above 50 percent, giving Power majority control of CSL. Power also acquired majority control of The Investors Group in 1970 through share trades with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Com¬ merce and Canadian Pacific Investments, and purchases on the open market. By the end of 1970, Power held 50.2 percent of Investors voting shares directly, a further 13.2 percent indirectly through Im¬ perial Life, and a further 9.5 percent through Great West Life.”

2 more highlights Sign in to View

Related Patterns