Sell the Company to Itself — Internal Reverse Takeovers
Books Teaching This Pattern
Evidence
Rising to Power - Paul Desmarais & Power Corporation
Dave Greber · 4 highlights
"later. In June, 1972, Canada Steamship Lines, Power’s only directly wholly owned subsidiary, bought almost all of Power’s investment portfolio for $145 million. The sale didn’t seem to make sense. For $145 million, csl bought Power’s investments in Dominion Glass Co. Ltd., The Investors Group, Consolidated-Bathurst and the Gesca $19.6-million income debenture. The deal included Trans-Canada Corp. Fund and through it one of its holdings, Shawinigan Industries Ltd., the interests in Laurentide, Argus, Imperial Life and other Power investments. Desmarais had essentially sold Power to itself, accomplishing an internal reverse takeover. Technically, the manoeuvre was a realign¬ ment of assets, because Power didn’t make any profit on the deal. The $145-million purchase price was book value (the value carried on the books computed as total assets less outstanding debt), paid $70.5 million in cash and $74.6 million in promissory notes with 9.5 percent interest, plus a series of debentures staggered to come due at intervals between 1972 and 1992. The sale solved one problem each for Power and csl. One effect was that by transferring some of its debt to csl, Power gave csl a way to reduce its income taxes."
"Desmarais moved further to reshape Power by acquiring control of Canada Steamship Lines (csl). Here he used the reverse takeover with a twist: he sold a wholly owned subsidiary of Power, Provincial Transport, to CSL, a company in which Power already held a major stake (45.7 percent). The selling price was $17,820,000, of which $3.8 million was cash. The rest was enough csl shares to raise Power’s voting stake above 50 percent, giving Power majority control of CSL. Power also acquired majority control of The Investors Group in 1970 through share trades with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Com¬ merce and Canadian Pacific Investments, and purchases on the open market. By the end of 1970, Power held 50.2 percent of Investors voting shares directly, a further 13.2 percent indirectly through Im¬ perial Life, and a further 9.5 percent through Great West Life."
"In late 1964, to gain majority control of Gelco, Desmarais sold to Gelco, for $7.8 million, the assets of Transportation Management, less the shares it held in Gelco. In payment, Gelco issued enough Gelco shares to Desmarais and Parisien to cover the purchase, raising their total holdings in Gelco to 80 percent. No cash changed hands."
"CSL, on the other hand, had borrowed a good portion of the $70 million cash it had paid to Power, essentially assuming the debt Power incurred to purchase csl. Because csl was an operating company with income from operations, it could write off the interest on the debt against income and reduce its taxes. The same could be done with the interest it paid on the debentures given to Power. The reduced income taxes meant higher retained earnings and, consequently, higher dividends for shareholders, in this case, Power."