Entity Dossier
entity

Narragansett

Strategic Concepts & Mechanics

Strategic ManeuverLeveraged Buyouts Solve the Owner's Estate Trap
Structural VulnerabilityRaw Land Is the Worst Inflation Hedge
Mental ModelAvoid Catastrophe Before Chasing Growth
Strategic PatternMarket Price Chronically Understates Intrinsic Value
Mental ModelInvest in Your Own Company, Not Tax Shelters
Identity & CultureReturn-on-Assets Incentives Over Profit-Sharing
Structural VulnerabilityGreed-Driven Capital Floods Kill Every Gold Rush
Operating PrincipleMandatory Sabbaticals Prevent Executive Burnout
Mental ModelTake the First Loss or Drown in Ten
Capital StrategyPension Funds in High Cash Flow, Not Stocks
Risk DoctrineBoth-Sides Dealing Invites Derivative Suits
Strategic ManeuverUnrelated Diversification as Cycle Insurance
Structural VulnerabilityNew Capacity Destroys Its Own Price Forecast
Risk DoctrineBrilliant Chairman as Single Point of Failure
Strategic ManeuverBuy Leaders in Small Ponds, Never Minnows in Oceans
Implementation TacticStop the Party While Everyone's Dancing
Implementation TacticOpen-Ended Incentives Beat Capped Payouts

Primary Evidence

"ADVICE: Ifyou've raised capital with a public offering, be certain that you review frequently your statement of business purposes to avoid the careless mistake we made in the Bevis case. After the derivative action was brought, we even went to the expense of calling a special meeting of the Narragansett stockholders to give us retroactive approval of the transaction. Even though we got overwhelming approval, the court refused to dismiss the case. If we had not obtained the assistance of Abe Pomerantz in dealing with Mr. Garwin, this action could have been far more expensive. If we had not settled the case, the directors and officers could have been found guilty of hav- ing violated one of the i(Stated Business Purposes" in the original registration statement, and would have been required to pay the company $2 million. The Bevis investment was a dilly! In derivative suits it is usually advisable to make a reasonable court-ap- proved settlement that permits the corporate defendants to have the company reimburse them for all legal expenses. Otherwise you run the risk of having to pay not only the judgment but also all your legal expenses out ofyour own pocket."

Source:How to Lose $100,000,000 and Other Valuable Advice

"someone like Narragansett set up a new corporation to buy all of their assets and liabilities for tax basis net worth, they can reinvest in the same enterprise as minority stockholders, and manage it for the new owners. They can have "a piece of the action" with a relatively small investment in a highly leveraged* company, and yet get complete liquidity in their original business."

Source:How to Lose $100,000,000 and Other Valuable Advice

"It is interesting to look back and see how Narragansett became so heavily involved in many situations by repeatedly putting up more and more money without realizing that we would ultimately reach our maximum before the venture was successful."

Source:How to Lose $100,000,000 and Other Valuable Advice

"ADVICE: When you invest in a situation that really gets into difficulty, it is far better to take the first loss instead of struggling as we have in Bevis for fifteen years to try to recoup our original investment. As a result of our attempt to make a success out of this one bad investment, Narragansett invested an ad- ditional $2,340,000 and Narragansett stockholders, through subscribing for rights at $10 per share, put up another $1,000,000 of equity capital. The stockholders, creditors, and Narragansett lost close to $10,000,000 in Bevis. We should have written off that $1,100,000 loan when the company went into receivership. The grief we are going through is unbelievable!"

Source:How to Lose $100,000,000 and Other Valuable Advice

Appears In Volumes