Tax Arbitrage as Structural Weapon

“”

“The country’s tax and accounting system, moreover, encourages the assumption of debt—as occurs in these leveraged takeovers—at the expense of equity. Corporate income is taxed to corporations, and dividends are taxed to shareholders, creating a double tax. It is easier for a corporation to pay interest (on debt), which is tax deductible, than to pay dividends (on stock), which are not. A company in the 50 percent tax bracket can afford to pay a rate of 16 percent interest as easily as a rate of 8 percent in dividends. And the individual investor, who has to pay taxes on either the interest or the dividend, will generally prefer the higher interest payment.”

“The major difference between Riklis’ debt-laden acquisitions and those of Milken’s later acquirers was that Milken’s chosen would issue the bonds for cash and then give the cash to the shareholders, while Riklis would issue the bonds directly to the shareholders. Both Riklis and his successors a generation later, however, would be using to their advantage the same debt-favoring provision of the U.S. tax laws: interest (on bonds) is deductible, but dividends (on stock) are not. Therefore, assuming roughly a 50 percent corporate-income-tax rate, a company that can pay shareholders a rate of return of 7 percent on dividends can just as easily pay 14 percent interest on subordinated debt, because it can deduct the interest.”