Nils Andersson

"Nils Andersson and Gad enthusiastically took on the new project. But despite both of them constantly disparaging Americans and Frenchmen, who were already using the method successfully, their own results were poor. And both Gad and Andersson refused to consult anyone who already mastered the method. Quite soon, people began to wonder what was happening with the project. The reports gave clear signs that something was not right. And they never managed to show any paper where the plastic really stuck. “It’s damn strange that the paper department can’t make paper in the Eagan machine when everyone else apparently can,” Hans commented irritably on the missed development. “It’s not strange at all; they insist on doing everything themselves and refuse to learn from others’ experiences,” Erik Torudd replied. It was not until a year after the construction started that they figured out the temperature required for the plastic to really adhere. And that was due to an accident at work. A temperature regulator had malfunctioned, and the temperature of the extruder had begun to rise uncontrollably. Only then did the plastic adhere. The accident taught the Tetra Pak team something that the French and Americans had known for a long time. Only another year later would the method work well enough that it could be reliably used in production. But then, on the other hand, there were problems with Dupont, who was the rightful patent holder. “There is undoubtedly a patent infringement,” the company’s own patent engineer Tage Norberg also stated when the matter was discussed. However, Tetra Pak was saved by the fact that Erik Torudd had been shown the method already in 1951, and at that time there was no patent. Thus, Dupont had no legal ground against Tetra Pak. For the second time, Tetra Pak had cunningly appropriated a machine design."

"After returning to Sweden, Erik Torudd continued to advocate for the use of the S-50 and to apply HP Smith’s method to it. Now, it seemed that the winds were changing within the company. The board of Tetra Pak now included Ruben, Gad, Hans, Holger Crafoord, Erik Torudd, and the company’s skilled lawyer, Carl Borgström. When the dark-suited gentlemen gathered for a board meeting on the morning of February 4, 1952, they decided to build a copy of HP Smith’s machine. Erik Torudd and Harry Järund, who was co-opted onto the board, fought hard against the decision. Both thought it was better to either buy a finished machine or drawings. Otherwise, they risked several years being lost to development. Moreover, they thought it was immoral to copy someone else’s work. But they spoke to deaf ears. Tetra would copy the HP Smith machine. Responsible for the project were the technical genius Nils Andersson and Gad. The decision was bold, but entirely legal. Carr Sherman had voluntarily shown them a design that was not yet patented."

"Nils Andersson was employed at the company as a manager. The 35-year-old Andersson had originally been a typographer but was also a self-taught technical genius. Without any education in the field, he immediately understood complex technical relationships. Without plans, he could easily build the most complicated packaging machines, as long as he was told what they were to be used for. However, he could neither understand nor make any plans himself. He just saw the solutions in his mind."

"The pattern within Åkerlund & Rausing was clear: young talented men were hired and sent at someone else’s expense to the USA to follow the developments in the grocery and packaging industries. The results of the “espionage” were to be sent home to Ruben immediately. Afterward, if Ruben decided it was something to invest in, the assignment was passed on to Nils Andersson, who was tasked with constructing a suitable machine. The salesmen were well aware of this: that the company’s product range was predominantly based on American inventions. Ruben, on the other hand, liked to talk about them as Åkerlund & Rausing’s own achievements."