Tetra

Tetra

Peter Andersson och Tommy Larsson Segerlind

347 highlights · 17 concepts · 384 entities · 4 cornerstones · 5 signatures

Context & Bio

Swedish packaging company that turned a paper tetrahedron into a global monopoly on liquid food distribution, financing decades of unprofitable R&D through supplier credit manipulation and offshore commission structures, ultimately creating one of the world's largest private fortunes without ever accepting outside equity.

Era1929–2020: from Depression-era paper bags through postwar milk hygiene campaigns, Cold War-era developing world protein deficits, and EU antitrust battles to Chinese low-cost competition — always shaped by food safety regulation, protectionist dairy lobbies, and Sweden's punitive tax regime.ScaleWorld's #1 liquid food packaging company, 10 billion+ packages sold annually by the early 1970s, operations in 57+ countries, ~140 billion SEK turnover by 2019, owner family fortune exceeding 10 billion Swiss francs, packaging immortalized on Kenyan currency, and the aseptic Tetra Brik system gave a 20-year technological lead over all competitors.
Ask This Book
347 highlights
Cornerstone MovesHow they build businesses
Cornerstone Move
Sell Abroad Before Selling at Home
situational

The classic theory of how companies internationalize is based on the companies first establishing a stable domestic market. Once that is done and operations at home are consolidated, they start working on the export markets. It is a process that often takes several years. In the case of Tetra Pak, it was exactly the opposite. While they were working on the Swedish market, they tried to spread their products all over the world.

3 evidence highlights — click to expand
Cornerstone Move
Kill the Cash Cow to Feed the Tiger
situational

They also did not want to list any of their other companies on the stock market, since Tetra Pak’s poor finances had also dragged down their value. Thus, they would not be able to raise enough money from an IPO of them either. Eventually, they concluded that the only thing they could do was to sell Åkerlund & Rausing and thereby save Tetra Pak, at least for a while. For Ruben, deciding to sell Åkerlund & Rausing was relatively easy. On one hand, he was most interested in working on new projects, on the other hand, Holger had closed the company’s cashbox for Tetra Pak. Ruben simply could not withdraw more money from Åkerlund & Rausing to finance the further development of Tetra Pak. Another major contributing reason for deciding to sell Åkerlund & Rausing was that they had noticed that the company’s revenue curve had begun to flatten out. The company had been first in the market with disposable paper packaging and had thrived in the rapidly growing market. But now there were several competitors, and the market was largely cornered. Holger and Ruben had no choice. Enskilda Banken was pressing them through CEO Marc Wallenberg, Marcus Wallenberg’s eldest son. He refused to lend more money to Ruben’s and Holger’s company. Instead, he demanded that they find money elsewhere.

3 evidence highlights — click to expand
Cornerstone Move
Rent the Razor, Sell the Paper
situational

The dairies did not buy the machines, but rented them for a relatively low cost. Tetra Pak made money instead by charging production royalties and by requiring customers to commit to only buying Tetra Pak’s specially treated paper. When the contracts were drawn up, Erik Torudd wanted a clause that would force customers to pay triple royalty if they used someone else’s paper. However, Holger considered it unnecessary, as Tetra Pak could always sell its paper as cheaply as any competitors. Torudd protested, fearing that paper mills would soon gain access to Dupont’s coating method and start producing equivalent paper on their own. He argued that it wasn’t certain that Tetra Pak would be able to withstand the competition and since the paper was the company’s major source of revenue, it would ultimately threaten the operation. But Holger had Ruben on his side. “Yes, yes, that’s enough for us to take back the machine if there’s any cheating,” Ruben commented. “Are you really willing to take back the machine if it means a whole city then has no milk distribution possibilities?” asked Erik Torudd, who did not believe Ruben was serious. “Of course,” Ruben replied. It turned out as Ruben had said. What Tetra Pak committed to in return for the stringent contract terms was a reliable service organization. It was a factor whose importance could not be underestimated. For a dairy, it would be a minor disaster if the machines came to a stop and the milk spoiled. Tetra Pak promised to quickly fix any faults or immediately supply replacement machines. This unique service would later become one of the company’s most important selling points, if not the most important. Once Tetra Pak had gotten the machines into the dairies, the retailers were the key group, as a retailer convinced that the tetra was much easier to handle would soon stop buying bulk milk for their stores. But Tetra Pak also had to try to overcome consumers’ resistance to buying, since enough protests from consumers could potentially push the dairies to revert to delivering only bulk milk or glass bottles.

3 evidence highlights — click to expand
Cornerstone Move
Buy the Entire Milk Chain from Udder to Shelf
situational

The day after, the front pages of the newspapers were dominated by the biggest corporate purchase in Swedish history – carried out by a single family. Through the purchase of Alfa Laval, Tetra Pak gained control over the entire production chain from milking to packaging. On January 1, 1993, the two companies merged and a new major corporation, Tetra Laval, was created.

3 evidence highlights — click to expand
Signature MovesHow they operate & think
Signature Move
Copy the Machine Then Outrun the Patent
situational
After returning to Sweden, Erik Torudd continued to advocate for the use of the S-50 and to apply HP Smith’s method to it. Now, it seemed that the winds were changing within the company. The board of Tetra Pak now included Ruben, Gad, Hans, Holger Crafoord, Erik Torudd, and the company’s skilled lawyer, Carl Borgström. When the dark-suited gentlemen gathered for a board meeting on the morning of February 4, 1952, they decided to build a copy of HP Smith’s machine. Erik Torudd and Harry Järund, who was co-opted onto the board, fought hard against the decision. Both thought it was better to either buy a finished machine or drawings. Otherwise, they risked several years being lost to development. Moreover, they thought it was immoral to copy someone else’s work. But they spoke to deaf ears. Tetra would copy the HP Smith machine. Responsible for the project were the technical genius Nils Andersson and Gad. The decision was bold, but entirely legal. Carr Sherman had voluntarily shown them a design that was not yet patented.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Patriarch Approves Accounts Until Death
situational
Ruben’s patriarchal disposition meant that it was not until the mid-seventies that his son Hans could take over as the real power holder in Tetra Pak and start running the company almost entirely independently. But Ruben still dominated him to some extent – no major decisions were made without consulting Ruben. Until his death, it was Ruben who ultimately decided what applied. His last action within Tetra Pak was to approve the financial statements – this happened the day before he died.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Secrecy So Total Hotel Staff Cannot Clean
situational
On Tuesday, January 22, 1991, eight people from Tetra Pak gathered at the Grand Hotel in Stockholm: Bertil Hagman with his wife, Jörgen Haglind, director of communications, Bengt Eckerwall, head of research in Lausanne, Lennart Ohlsson, head of finance in Lausanne, the secretaries Rosemarie Werner and Kristina Kessel, and the trusted chauffeur Bengt Jensen. All the rooms were reserved under their names and not the company’s. Three of the rooms were converted into offices. The blackout was total; hotel staff were forbidden to clean at regular times and to prevent leaks, all transportation to and from the hotel was handled by Bengt Jensen. The Tetra people even had their own telephone and fax lines installed to minimize the risk of eavesdropping.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Open Door Cancels Any Meeting for a New Idea
situational
Their perhaps unrequited love for technology also meant that they were always open to new technical ideas. As long as both were still at the headquarters in Lund, their doors were always open for the technicians. If someone had a new idea to present, both of the Rausing brothers were prepared to cancel any meetings whatsoever in order to instead hear about it. If they found the idea worth trying, it was just for the technicians to proceed.
2 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Offshore Commission Architecture as Dynasty Shield
situational
Through ingenious solutions, the family, primarily Hans, and its employees, especially Carl Borgström and the administrative head at the headquarters, Ingvar Wenehed, set up a network of companies whose purpose was to keep money outside of Sweden, beyond Swedish taxation, and beyond Swedish currency regulations. In Switzerland, the company Société Outremère (Socomer) was registered, created solely to absorb commission money for all the paper, plastic, paint, and aluminum that Tetra Pak purchased from suppliers. Normally, such purchases go through an agent who receives a commission of 2–5 percent of the invoiced amount. What the agent is paid for is that he formally takes on the credit risk until the goods are paid for by the buyer. If, for example, the buyer goes bankrupt before the payment date, it is the agent who takes the financial hit.
3 evidence highlights
More Insights
Capital Strategy
Supplier Credit as Venture Capital
situational
One of the company’s largest expenses was paper purchases. Ruben decided that no invoice from the paper mills would be paid within the stipulated 30 days. Instead, the supplier credit would be extended as far as possible. But there were no negotiations with the paper mills, especially involving Billerud and Uddeholm, but entirely a unilateral decision on Ruben’s part. After he had decided how the financing would be managed, he drove the line to absurdum. Payment times would, entirely in accordance with Ruben’s tactics, sometimes amount to eleven months. Holger, who was a much more sensitive person than Ruben, found the situation uncomfortable and wanted Ruben to change his mind. Invoices should be paid on time, was Holger’s firm belief. But he gained no listening at all from Ruben. “It’s only natural that they contribute to the payment, since we’re increasing their market. They haven’t been very good at that themselves,” claimed Ruben. Ruben’s reasoning was correct to the extent that the conservative Swedish paper companies were terrible at creating new markets themselves. It was also entirely correct that Tetra Pak gave the paper mills a huge sales boost. But despite everything, it is customary to negotiate supplier credits. That’s what the paper mills believed, too. However, Ruben was not at all ashamed that Tetra Pak did not pay a single invoice on time. Instead, he only said the same thing to them as he said to Holger. “You are obliged to help with our financing since we are expanding your markets.” When the paper mills’ managers found no understanding from Ruben, they instead turned to Holger who suffered and was ashamed. “You must understand that I can’t do anything. Ruben has decided that this is how it should be, and I can’t influence him,” Holger was forced to say. The paper mills were caught in a catch-22. Even though they wanted to get their money, they knew they couldn’t push Tetra into bankruptcy. Then there would be no money at all, as the company had virtually no assets. Another important creditor was the construction company ABV, which voluntarily gave very long credits to Tetra Pak’s new factory facilities. The rapidly growing business required almost constant construction of new premises. Without ABV’s willingness to extend credit, it probably wouldn’t have been possible for Tetra Pak to expand as quickly as it did. But it wasn’t just loans and credits that financed the development of Brik. Since the aseptic package hit the market, fantastic sales successes were noted. Mainly, the system was sold in developing countries – exactly as planned. In a short period, the company brought in – for that time – enormous sums. But the expansion also cost.
3 evidence highlights
Competitive Advantage
Fraud-Proof Packaging as Market Maker
situational
Tetra Pak’s success in Kenya was mainly due to two things. The first was that the packaging was secure. No one could open it and then reseal it. This made fraud impossible. This was not the case with competitors’ paper packaging, as they were coated with wax instead of paper. If one opens such packaging, it is easy to reseal by heating the wax.
3 evidence highlights
Strategic Pattern
Developing World as First-Best Customer
situational
what was decisive was that it was so cheap compared to what the competitors could offer. Thanks to Erik Wallenberg’s ingenious tetrahedral shape, the material usage was only half as much as for competing packaging. And this meant that even poor countries could afford the Tetra system. Tetra Pak’s method of packaging milk is indeed one of the very few Western industrial systems that have been able to be directly adopted by developing countries without major problems.
3 evidence highlights
Competitive Advantage
Twenty-Year Technical Lead as Moat
situational
Overall, the problem-solving of the first generation – technically, market-wise, and legally – had given subsequent employees a 20-30 year lead. Many of Tetra Pak’s later generations of employees have lived under the illusion that the company’s products have always sold themselves. This was certainly not the case in the 1940s, 50s, and 60s.
3 evidence highlights
Decision Framework
Non-Family Crisis Manager as Dynasty Insurance
situational
To maintain real control over a company, simply owning it is not enough. One must also have executive power in their hands – without it, the influence is limited to what is decided in the boardroom and at shareholders’ meetings. If the Rausing family did not have someone in the CEO position, they would no longer have total control over the operations. Especially since Holger had a controlling stake in the company and could thus block decision-making. But Ruben had no choice: if Holger did not take over the actual management of Tetra Pak, it was not only the dynasty building that would crumble, but the entire life’s work: Åkerlund & Rausing, Östanå, and Tetra Pak.
3 evidence highlights
Competitive Advantage
Service Guarantee as Lock-In Mechanism
situational
When the company’s real success product, the aseptic Briken, finally worked, the first Tetra employees had all been replaced. But by then, the marketers had already laid the foundation for Tetra Pak as a well-established brand. They had also been involved in building a service organization that customers knew they could rely on. Even though the tetrahedron as a shape was a relatively consumer-unfriendly packaging that took many years to become fully functional, the company had managed to acquire a quality image through its skilled marketing and service staff.
3 evidence highlights
Identity & Culture
Dynasty Tax Drives Every Structural Decision
situational
Their conversation became crucial for a very important decision, to move Tetra Pak abroad. The family had long been worried about Sweden’s heavy taxation on profits, capital, and inheritance. Hans had calculated that if he died, the children would be forced to pay an inheritance tax of a total of 350 percent, as the tax would be paid with already taxed funds. If they wanted to keep the company within the family dynasty, staying in Sweden was not an option, he assessed.
3 evidence highlights
In 2 books
Operating Principle
Disciplined Imagination Over Pure Invention
situational
Ruben always maintained that the most important thing for a corporate leader was to have “disciplined imagination.” By this, he meant that imagination should be used in a purposeful way.
3 evidence highlights
In Their Own Words

Have you tried?

Ruben's wife Lisa Rausing, responding to his objection that sealing paper through milk was impossible — the question that unlocked the entire tetrahedron project.

It was when we tackled that problem that we suddenly discovered that we were holding a tiger by the tail. And there it matters to hold on!

Gad Rausing, describing the moment the family realized the aseptic packaging system had unlimited global potential.

Define the problems, delegate the decision-making, CEOs should have a helicopter perspective and should not engage in routine work, power is necessary to have but a sign of weakness to need to use.

Hans Rausing in a rare 2006 interview describing his leadership philosophy, including his famous stamp: 'Return to sender. Decide yourself.'

Tetra Pak is bankrupt. It is now under administration. And decisions about expenditures can from now on only be made by me.

Holger Crafoord informing Hans and Gad Rausing that he was seizing operational control to save the company from collapse.

You are obliged to help with our financing since we are expanding your markets.

Ruben Rausing justifying his unilateral decision to delay supplier payments by up to eleven months — treating paper mills as involuntary creditors.

Mistakes & Lessons
Sons Before Competence Nearly Killed the Company

Installing inexperienced family heirs as CEO and VP without earned credibility demoralized employees, created technical chaos, and drove the company to the brink of bankruptcy — requiring the non-family partner Holger Crafoord to declare the company 'under administration' and strip the sons of real power.

Gad's Siberia and the Solvent Method

Refusing to learn from others who already mastered extrusion coating cost years of development time and hospitalized workers — the correct temperature was only discovered by accident, teaching that ideological stubbornness against external knowledge is not the same as self-reliance.

Ruben's Letter That Killed the Continental Can Deal

Ruben's inability to accept intermediaries and his habit of lecturing people who outranked him in their own market destroyed the partnership with the world's largest packaging company — a deal that could have accelerated US entry by years.

Continue Reading
Related Books
With eyes on the path (translated)
Gustaf Douglas

Why linked: Shares Tetra Pak, Hans, and Rausing family.

The Finance Princes - The Story of the Swedish Venture Capitalists
Lotta Engzell-Larsson

Why linked: Shares Tetra Pak, Alfa Laval, and Sweden.

Sweden's Most Powerful Families - The Companies, the People, the Money
Anders Ström

Why linked: Shares Wallenberg, Sweden, and Stockholm.

Serious Fun
Paul Goldsmith

Why linked: Shares India and ICI.

Apple in China
Patrick McGee

Why linked: Shares India.

Key People
Ruben Rausing
Person

Primary figure in this dossier arc (152 mentions).

Hans Rausing
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (49 mentions).

Erik Torudd
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (49 mentions).

Holger Crafoord
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (36 mentions).

Gad
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (23 mentions).

Key Entities
Raw Highlights

This is the story of a remarkable man, a family dynasty, and a company. Ruben Rausing did something that should have been impossible: starting and maintaining control over a company that became a world leader in its industry without any initial capital. And not only that: in the end, the Rausing family held one of the world’s largest private fortunes. Thus, this book is also about money, power, and influence. It can also be seen as an almost 90-year-long innovation process that continues today.

The book is an attempt to describe as accurately as possible how an idea is born, developed, realized, and brought to market, while a completely new company emerges.

But it is also an attempt to describe how one acquires, uses, and retains power.

In Ruben Rausing’s case, it was about ensuring that his own family retained control at all times. In some cases, he failed, but in the long term, he succeeded. His strategy was to turn the family into an industrial dynasty while being obsessed with solving problems or improving old solutions. But his overriding concern was his dynastic ambitions.

In countries like Great Britain, the USA, and Germany, milk was already being sold in paper packages. But common to all was that they were too expensive because they required a lot of material and costly manufacturing processes. Since they also had to be filled one by one, the filling process itself was also costly. Thus, Åkerlund & Rausing had to either find a cheaper material or another way to manufacture and fill the cartons.

He liked to work at night, and it was also now that he reasoned step by step towards a possible solution. Using pure logic, he pondered possible shapes that minimized material usage. In his mind, he envisioned a tube made of paper. “If one folds it at one end and then folds in the opposite direction at the other end, a small pyramid of paper is formed. It can thus be folded from a single piece of paper and only needs gluing at two seams. Thus, there is no material waste whatsoever,” he thought in the darkness of a February night. Although Wallenberg realized that he had found the optimal shape, he was not yet completely sure if he had really solved the problem. During the night, he had actually come up with two more possible solutions that he also wanted to try. Moreover, he had not yet actually folded any tetrahedron in reality.

People often find it difficult to accept new inventions, simply because human capacity to think in new ways is limited. Therefore, Wallenberg also encountered skepticism when he showed what he had come up with. Even Ruben Rausing, who had “think differently” as one of his mottos, had a hard time embracing the little ingenious invention. A few days later, when he asked Erik Wallenberg to come up and show how things were going with the milk packages, Wallenberg placed a number of tetrahedrons on a tray and went up.

Ruben Rausing was far from alone in his skepticism. Erik Torudd saw the tetrahedron for the first time a few days later. He became thoughtful. He has described the event as “a shock.” The package looked like nothing else – not round and not square. And how would one be able to fill it? It was made in one piece. Erik Wallenberg was alone in understanding during the first week that he had really constructed a package that would work. That the little quirky package would lay the foundation for the Rausing family’s entry into the very exclusive circle of billionaires, no one realized. Not even the inventor himself, Erik Wallenberg.

Wallenberg then continued to try to solve the problem of how the package should be filled. The work was entirely focused on the tetrahedron being folded from a single sheet of paper. Then an opening would be left in one of the seams. In the opening, the milk would be filled. And finally, the package would be sealed. It was, in other words, a traditional – and expensive – solution to the problem.

Most people have at some point experienced suddenly just seeing the solution to a problem in front of them, without really being able to explain why or how they came to the answer. Such a moment occurred that day when Erik Torudd came down to the laboratory and saw how Wallenberg and his assistants took a long paper tube and folded tetrahedrons in a long chain before they split them apart.

Suddenly, he saw in front of him how the package that had seemed impossible could be used after all. He understood how they would be filled: by first filling the tube with milk, then forming the tetrahedrons, and finally cutting them off individually, one would get a long line of filled tetrahedrons. Perhaps the package would be worth a try after all. The idea of continuous filling had been born. And it had only been a week or so since Erik Wallenberg first showed his tetrahedrons.

The continuous filling was one of the factors that would give the tetrahedron an advantage over competitors’ packages. The competing packages were filled only after the folding was complete, before they were finally sealed. Such a process was anything but cheap. But the continuous filling, on the other hand, meant that many costly steps could be avoided.

Although Ruben Rausing liked it when employees dared to think in new ways, he did not always accept their ideas. It often took time before he could approve them. But once he had finished pondering and embraced the ideas, he often presented them as his own or as his family’s. The same happened with the tetrahedron: after Torudd had told him about how the filling problem could be solved, it took a few weeks before Rausing had finished thinking and definitively realized that the tetrahedron was worth a try.

He realized that nothing could be considered impossible until one had tried. These words would gradually become central in his life. As soon as someone was skeptical about different proposals, he asked “have you tried?”

When he invited his Deputy CEO, Holger Crafoord, to lunch at the house on Tomegapsgatan, he still was not convinced. Now he wanted to hear what he thought about the tetrahedron’s possibilities. But at the lunch, it was instead Ruben Rausing’s wife, Lisa, who said the liberating words. She suggested exactly the same thing as Erik Torudd had done. But her husband still resisted. “It’s not possible. You cannot seal the packages straight through the milk without it taking on taste,” he objected. “Have you tried?” asked Lisa Rausing.

At this stage, when his wife had said the decisive words, Ruben Rausing decided to bet everything on the development of the tetrahedron. Suddenly he was almost manically charmed by the idea. It is no exaggeration to say that he nearly became obsessed with the idea of the tetrahedron.

He tasked Torudd to immediately apply for a patent for Wallenberg’s tetrahedron. And the drawings of the tetrahedron were handed over to the patent firm AW Andersson in Malmö, so they could write the patent application. Erik Torudd had a hard time getting the agency’s representatives to understand that the tetrahedron really was an invention and that it truly could be used as packaging. Eventually, Rausing became irritated and instructed Torudd to call a meeting with the patent firm.

Now, there was both a concrete packaging and an idea of how it could be filled. Rausing was convinced that they had found a superior solution for how milk should be packaged. He realized that the packaging could become a mass product that could be manufactured in gigantic quantities. If he just played his cards right, the royalty income from the production would be enormous. Ruben Rausing had sometimes played with the idea of making the family into an industrial dynasty of the same kind as the Wallenbergs. But so far, realism had held back his dreams. The milk packaging, on the other hand, made his imagination take off again. But for the dream to come true, all patents had to be written to him. Therefore, Erik Wallenberg transferred the ownership of the tetrahedron patent to Ruben Rausing in December that year.

When laboratory experiments showed that it was possible to seal the paper with heat without affecting the taste of milk, Rausing wanted Erik Torudd’s continuous filling to be patented immediately. However, he bypassed Erik Torudd, who was the inventor. Instead, he contacted Tage Nilsson at AW Andersson. Since he was completely non-technical, it was Nilsson who had to make the drawings for the patent application that was filed in August. Ruben Rausing himself was listed as the inventor.

As the tetrahedron later succeeded globally, various myths about its origin developed: one of them is that it was merely by chance that Wallenberg came up with the solution, since he was actually just playing with some paper while he was home in a feverish delirium. Rausing himself told this story in various contexts. Another version of the story is that Ruben Rausing himself came up with the tetrahedron when he saw his wife stuffing sausages. He also started referring to the tetrahedron as “his patent,” which was correct but gave a misleading impression that he had invented it himself. And Torudd’s idea of continuous filling, he attributed to his wife.

It was not until 1991 that Erik Wallenberg was publicly recognized when he was awarded the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences’ grand gold medal. But perhaps the finest, albeit informal, praise he received was already in the mid-fifties from the Danish Nobel laureate in physics, Professor Niels Bohr. “I have never seen such a distinguished practical application of a mathematical idea,” Bohr said in his quiet, almost shy manner when he visited the factory.

“Time and again, one returns to the same question: Who is really the inventor, the person who orders a solution to a problem or the one who comes up with the solution?” he would later say during a dispute over a patent, where he had falsely claimed himself as the inventor.

The industrialization and urbanization of Sweden had made it suddenly possible to rise in society even if one did not belong to a rich or noble family. But despite this, August and Mathilda were still surprised by the commitment and joy of discovery that their son showed.

The economy for the approximately 1,200 people who lived in Råå was still in a fairly rudimentary stage and was largely locally based. Much of the trade still took place through barter transactions between fishermen and farmers. One group had what the other eagerly desired. Fishermen needed meat, milk, flour, and other items, while the farmers needed fish. Above all, the farmers wanted the coveted herring. In the autumns when the people in Råå and its surrounding area could see the herring fleet return after its long time at sea, the harbor square quickly filled with people. And when the herring was landed, the barter began. The farmers got their herring and the fishermen received meat, which they smoked and salted for their winter needs.

Which was exactly what he was. He had never been in such an environment before and had never associated with people who had fine names like Gyllenstierna, de Fine Licht and Oxehufvud, as some of his schoolmates were called. They were children of the upper class in Helsingborg. Unlike the parents of the artisan and farmer children from the villages around the city, their fathers worked as shipowners, officers, lawyers, and doctors. Ruben’s social ascent had – probably without him really understanding the extent of it at the time – begun.

At the secondary school, whose time-typical grand Swedish motto was “Knowledge and manly virtue, loyalty to the homeland”, he received, in his own words, “professorial teaching from the beginning”, thanks to the highly qualified teachers who were recruited from the University of Lund. All lecturers except one had doctorates.

When all the examinations were done, it was clear: all the students had passed despite the challenging knowledge tests they had undergone. Class R IV came running out to the tunes of Prince Gustaf’s graduation song, singing and putting on their white caps. The town’s citizenry could breathe a sigh of relief: they would avoid the disgrace.

August and Mathilda Andersson were proud of their talented son; now the first in the family had graduated from high school – a key to success. Moreover, young Ruben had received distinguished grades, well above average. They were satisfied and could hardly have wished for more. But young Ruben had completely different and bigger plans. During his time at the grammar school, his self-confidence had grown. The grades were too good to just be wasted on employment somewhere, he thought. He had decided on pursuing higher education.

The answer to Ruben’s troubles was Aunt Johanna. This enterprising woman had managed to earn some money by selling fish in the inland markets. On days when the fish didn’t sell, she exchanged the leftovers for farmers’ eggs, meat, and butter. When she returned to Råå, she sold the bartered goods to the fishing population. In this way, she could charge higher prices for the fish, and among the fishermen, she could sell the agricultural products at a higher price than would have been possible inland. Aunt Johanna had, in other words, on her own and without any formal economic training, discovered the law of supply and demand. Her business acumen had over the years resulted in a larger saved amount of money.

When Ruben and his mother asked her for help, she immediately agreed. She had no children of her own and felt she might as well help her nieces and nephews. It was a fortunate day for Ruben. Aunt Johanna’s loan of five hundred kronor ensured his studies at the School of Business, Economics and Law were secured. He resigned from Sydsvenska Kreditaktiebolaget. It was a big step for a young man who had also only recently started his job.

In hindsight, Ruben has occasionally claimed that he had decided in secondary school that he would become a wealthy man and that he was already clear about attending the School of Business, Economics and Law. In response to a teacher’s question about his future, he is said to have answered, “I’m going to be rich. I’m going to be a banker.” Unfortunately, these claims do not deserve much credibility, but are instead to be regarded as tales. Ruben liked to paint a picture of himself as a man who has always followed a straight path – a man who has marked out a path and then consistently followed it.

What really interested the young student was industrial organization and economics. He was impressed by Eli Heckscher, who was known for being a very skilled theorist but also a distinguished pedagogue. It is not very surprising that these subjects attracted Ruben. From an early age, he was a person who, with unshakable self-confidence, preferred to devote himself to visions and to drawing the big lines instead of dealing with the everyday – and both economics, which at this time was largely reasoning and reflective, and the theory of organization were subjects that left a lot of room for this. On the other hand, pure business economics left no room at all for extensive speculation during Ruben’s time.

The burning interest in economics would pay off. Of all the students that Eli Heckscher examined during his professorial years, only five received the highest grades in economics. Ruben was one of them. The others were Jacob Wallenberg (1912), Bertil Ohlin (1919), Alf Johansson (1922), and Göte Engfors (1924).

When one of his closest associates protested against the historical narrative on one occasion, Ruben simply replied with “You don’t know what you’re talking about” – a comment that became increasingly common over the years. The very strong self-esteem that Ruben had in his youth increasingly turned into overestimation.

However, it wasn’t long before he began to question his work assignments. He was definitely meant for bigger tasks, he believed, and should not waste his time on such things that other, more unimaginative people could do. Ruben Andersson had high expectations for life and he was in a hurry.

Arfwedson was very upset. During the conversation with him, Ruben was informed that firstly, one did not simply leave Enskilda Banken, as it was a privilege to start there. Secondly, it was not in the bank’s interest for young men “who mostly just got in the way” to leave before they had contributed anything useful. “I understand all that, but I was actually not thinking primarily of the bank’s interests but of my own,” Ruben confidently replied and resigned with immediate effect.

During the directors’ customary afternoon tea in the chairman’s room, many voices were heard expressing outrage at the audacity that Ruben had demonstrated.

Once the courses began, both Swedish guest students were surprised to note that the interaction between students and teachers was much less formal than in Sweden, where teaching was characterized by German academic tradition. An example was that students were allowed to interrupt the lecturers with questions without hesitation. Törnqvist and Ruben found the system very positive, provided that the questions presented were intelligent and of general interest.

John B Clark’

One company that made a significant impression on them during the trip was the Winchester Arms Factory, which was busy converting production from wartime activity to normal peace levels when they arrived. When World War I broke out in 1914, the factory had 8,000 employees, four years later they were 25,000. It goes without saying that if it was difficult to convert to wartime production, it is infinitely more difficult to convert to peace conditions, Ruben soberly noted. But thanks to the management applying Scientific Management, everything was conducted rationally and methodically, he believed.