
Context & Bio
Argues that a simple, transparent goal-setting system (Objectives and Key Results) paired with continuous feedback conversations creates the operating rhythm that turns strategy into execution — and that most organizations fail not from bad strategy but from the absence of a shared, measurable language for priorities.
Argues that a simple, transparent goal-setting system (Objectives and Key Results) paired with continuous feedback conversations creates the operating rhythm that turns strategy into execution — and that most organizations fail not from bad strategy but from the absence of a shared, measurable language for priorities.
“If everything's at green, you failed.”
Bono describing John Doerr's advice to the ONE Campaign about why full goal attainment signals insufficient ambition.
“The single greatest motivator is 'making progress in one's work.' The days that people make progress are the…”
Daniel Pink, author of Drive, on why visible progress tracking outperforms financial incentives as a motivator.
“We don't hire smart people to tell them what to do. We hire smart people so they can tell us what to do.”
Steve Jobs quote used to illustrate why roughly half of OKRs should originate bottom-up from frontline contributors.
“Our goals are servants to our purpose, not the other way around.”
Doerr on why OKRs should be dropped mid-cycle when they become obsolete rather than rigidly pursued.
“At any given time, some significant percentage of people are working on the wrong things. The challenge is knowing which ones.”
Aaron Levie, CEO of Box, explaining why transparent goal-setting is essential for organizational focus.
A mission is directional and permanent; an objective has concrete steps, a metric, and a deadline — conflating them produces goals too vague to act on or measure.
When OKR attainment directly determines bonuses, employees set easy targets and stop stretching — the organization suffers most because it loses the innovation that comes from ambitious failure.
Startups that defer structured goal-setting until they're large either die when they outgrow their founders' capacity, or succeed and replace the founding team — either way, the lack of early goal discipline is fatal.
Why linked: Shares John Doerr, Google, and Intuit.
“Reflection OKRs are inherently action oriented. But when action is relentless and unceasing, it can be a hamster wheel of grim striving. In my view, the key to satisfaction is to set aggressive goals, achieve most of them, pause to reflect on the achievement, and then repeat the cycle. Learning “from direct experience,” a Harvard Business School study found, “can be more effective if coupled with reflection—that is, the intentional attempt to synthesize, abstract, and articulate the key lessons taught by experience.” The philosopher and educator John Dewey went a step further: “We do not learn from experience . . . we learn from reflecting on experience.””
“Without frequent status updates, goals slide into irrelevance; the gap between plan and reality widens by the day. At quarter’s end (or worse, year’s end), we’re left with zombie OKRs, on-paper whats and hows devoid of life or meaning.”
“Altogether, we averaged 62.5 percent (or a raw score of 0.625) on our KRs for this objective, a respectable grade. The Intel board judged it below expectations but not too far below, because they knew how aggressively management set our goals. As a rule, we’d enter a quarter knowing we wouldn’t achieve all of them. If a department so much as approached 100 percent, it was presumed to be setting its sights too low—and there would be hell to pay.”
“The way Page sees it, a ten percent improvement means that you’re doing the same thing as everybody else. You probably won’t fail spectacularly, but you are guaranteed not to succeed wildly. That’s why Page expects Googlers to create products and services that are ten times better than the competition. That means he isn’t satisfied with discovering a couple of hidden efficiencies or tweaking code to achieve modest gains. Thousand percent improvement requires rethinking problems, exploring what’s technically possible and having fun in the process.”
“Stretch Variables To succeed, a stretch goal cannot seem like a long march to nowhere. Nor can it be imposed from on high without regard to realities on the ground. Stretch your team too fast and too far, and it may snap. In pursuing high-effort, high-risk goals, employee commitment is essential. Leaders must convey two things: the importance of the outcome, and the belief that it’s attainable.”
“When users spend more of their valuable time watching YouTube videos, they must perforce be happier with those videos. It’s a virtuous circle: More satisfied viewership (watch time) begets more advertising, which incentivizes more content creators, which draws more viewership. Our true currency wasn’t views or clicks—it was watch time. The logic was undeniable. YouTube needed a new core metric.”
“Research shows that public goals are more likely to be attained than goals held in private. Simply flipping the switch to “open” lifts achievement across the board.”
“we gradually changed from a house of brands (TurboTax, Quicken, QuickBooks) to the branded house of Intuit.”
“For best results, OKRs are scrutinized several times per quarter by contributors and their managers. Progress is reported, obstacles identified, key results refined. On top of these one-on-ones, teams and departments hold regular meetings to evaluate progress toward shared objectives. Whenever a committed OKR is failing, a rescue plan is devised.”
“Self-assessment In evaluating OKR performance, objective data is enhanced by the goal setter’s thoughtful, subjective judgment. For any given goal in a given quarter, there may be extenuating circumstances. A weak showing by the numbers might hide a strong effort; a strong one could be artificially inflated.”
“We don’t hire smart people to tell them what to do. We hire smart people so they can tell us what to do. —Steve Jobs”
“Edwin Locke, the patriarch of structured goal setting, mined a dozen studies for a quantitative correlation between goal difficulty and achievement. The arenas ranged widely, but the results were “unequivocal,” Locke wrote. “[T]he harder the goal the higher the level of performance. . . . Although subjects with very hard goals reached their goals far less often than subjects with very easy goals, the former consistently performed at a higher level than the latter.””
“Jim Collins’s memorable phrase in Good to Great—spark leaps to new levels: A BHAG is a huge and daunting goal—like a big mountain to climb. It is clear, compelling, and people “get it” right away. A BHAG serves as a unifying focal point of effort, galvanizing people and creating team spirit as people strive toward a finish line. Like the 1960s NASA moon mission, a BHAG captures the imagination and grabs people in the gut.”
“What radical, high-risk action needs to be considered? What do they need to stop doing? Where can they move resources or find new partners? By deadline, a healthy fraction of those impossible goals are somehow attained in full.”
“Aspirational goals draw on every OKR superpower. Focus and commitment are a must for targeting goals that make a real difference. Only a transparent, collaborative, aligned, and connected organization can achieve so far beyond the norm. And without quantifiable tracking, how can you know when you’ve reached that amazing stretch objective?”
“Superpower #4: Stretch for Amazing”
“Grove took a dim view of “managerial meddling”: “[T]he subordinate will begin to take a much more restricted view of what is expected of him, showing less initiative in solving his own problems and referring them instead to his [or her] supervisor. . . . [T]he output of the organization will consequently be reduced. . . .””
“In God we trust; all others must bring data. —W. Edwards Deming”
“We borrowed from Jim Collins: “What can you be the best at in the world?” Once we figured that out, we laid the OKR system on top of it. We believed that everyone should have a healthy and productive life, and Bill and Melinda were passionate about the role of technology in creating change. That was in our DNA.”
“OKR wrap-ups are retrospective and forward-looking at the same time. An unfinished objective might be rolled over to the next quarter, with a fresh set of key results—or perhaps its moment has passed, and it is appropriately dropped. Either way, sound management judgment comes first.”
“Here are some reflections for closing out an OKR cycle: Did I accomplish all of my objectives? If so, what contributed to my success? If not, what obstacles did I encounter? If I were to rewrite a goal achieved in full, what would I change? What have I learned that might alter my approach to the next cycle’s OKRs?”
“Connected companies are quicker companies. To grab a competitive advantage, both leaders and contributors need to link up horizontally, breaking through barriers.”
“Studies suggest that only 7 percent of employees “fully understand their company’s business strategies and what’s expected of them in order to help achieve the common goals.””
“Aaron Levie, founder and CEO of Box, the enterprise cloud company. “At any given time,” Aaron said, “some significant percentage of people are working on the wrong things. The challenge is knowing which ones.””
“Stephen Covey noted, “If the ladder is not leaning against the right wall, every step we take just gets us…”
“Even as modern goal setting successfully transcends the org chart, unacknowledged dependencies remain the number one cause of project slippage. The cure is lateral, cross-functional connectivity, peer-to-peer and team-to-team. For innovation and advanced problem solving, isolated individuals cannot match a connected group. Product relies on engineering, marketing on sales. As business becomes more intricate and initiatives more complex, interdependent divisions need a tool to help them reach the finish line together.”
“OKRs can be deployed to even greater effect in the cloud era. Horizontal alignment comes naturally. With open, public goal setting, the data and analytics team could see from the start what our financial systems team had in mind. It was immediately obvious that they should be working together, in parallel. The teams linked up their objectives in real time, rather than after the fact—a sea change from our historical way of doing things.”
“Daniel Pink, the author of Drive, agrees: “The single greatest motivator is ‘making progress in one’s work.’ The days that people make progress are the…”
“I’m a huge fan of goals, but they need to be handled correctly. At one point, the malaria team thought we’d eradicate the disease by 2015, which wasn’t realistic. When a goal is too aspirational, it’s bad for credibility. In philanthropy, I see people confusing objectives with missions all the time. A mission is directional. An objective has a set of concrete steps that you’re intentionally engaged in and actually trying to go for. It’s fine to have an ambitious objective, but how do you scale it? How do you measure it?”
“How can your team create maximum value? What would amazing look like?”
“At MyFitnessPal, Mike Lee considers all OKRs to be committed goals: difficult and demanding, yes, but attainable in full. “I am trying to set the bar right at where I think it should be,” he says. “If we get them all done, I’ll feel good about our progress.” That’s a reasonable approach, but not without pitfalls. Will Mike’s people shy away from objectives where they might top out at 90 percent? In my view, it’s better for leaders to set at least a modest stretch. Over time, as teams and individuals gain experience with OKRs, their key results will become more precise and more aggressive.”
“OKRs are adaptable by nature. They’re meant to be guardrails, not chains or blinders. As we track and audit our OKRs, we have four options at any point in the cycle: Continue: If a green zone (“on track”) goal isn’t broken, don’t fix it. Update: Modify a yellow zone (“needs attention”) key result or objective to respond to changes in the workflow or external environment. What could be done differently to get the goal on track? Does it need a revised time line? Do we back-burner other initiatives to free up resources for this one? Start: Launch a new OKR…”
“Intuit used to have nine different billing systems to serve our array of products, and each of them had special challenges. When you’re putting out fires every day, it’s hard to build a next-generation billing technology.”
“Where OKR scores pinpoint what went right or wrong in the work, and how the team might improve, self-assessments drive a superior goal-setting process for the next quarter. There are no judgments, only learnings.”
“IT, we’re always juggling the needs of internal partners with the demands of our end users. We bridge technology and business outcomes. Maybe toughest of all, we must balance the task of making systems work perfectly today (as our people expect) with our mandate to invest in the future.”
“The biggest risk of all is not taking one. —Mellody Hobson”
“my favorite definition of entrepreneurs: Those who do more than anyone thinks possible . . . with less than anyone thinks possible.*”
“Once each month, managers meet with their reports to discuss individual goals. The system has built-in, 360-degree feedback, with both parties comparing notes on a regular basis.”
“One underrated virtue of OKRs is that they can be tracked—and then revised or adapted as circumstances dictate. Unlike traditional, frozen, “set them and forget them” business goals, OKRs are living, breathing organisms.”
“As a leader, you must try to challenge the team without making them feel the goal is unachievable. I thought it unlikely we would reach our target in time. (Candidly, I thought there was no way we would get there.) But I also considered it important to keep pushing to the limit of our ability and beyond. By putting the 20 million out there, I knew good things would happen. Our stretch OKR gave the team direction and a barometer to measure our progress. It made complacency impossible. And it kept us all rethinking, every day, the framework for what we were doing. All of these things were more important than reaching a somewhat arbitrary target on a designated”