PRIME MOVERS
Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore and the Renewal of China

Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore and the Renewal of China

Murat Lama

23 highlights · 10 concepts · 19 entities · 2 cornerstones · 4 signatures

Context & Bio

Founding Prime Minister of Singapore who engineered a city-state's transformation from third-world port to first-world economic powerhouse, and whose governance model became the blueprint for China's modernization under Deng Xiaoping.

Era1960s-2000s Southeast Asia: post-colonial nation-building, Cold War ideological competition, Asian Tigers rise, China's opening, and the global shift from protectionism to free-market integration.ScaleBuilt Singapore from a newly independent city-state with no natural resources into one of the world's wealthiest nations per capita, directly influencing China's economic reform strategy through Deng Xiaoping's adoption of the Singapore model for governing 1.4 billion people.
Ask This Book
23 highlights
Cornerstone MovesHow they build businesses
Cornerstone Move
Invert the Third-World Playbook
situational

Lee Kuan Yew literally invented industrial outsourcing aimed at reducing production costs, with such a significant impact both on third-world development and on the deindustrialization of Western countries: “In the sixties, seventies, eighties, during the time of trendy and conformist theories held by third-world leaders influenced by the slogans ‘socialism,’ ‘communism,’ ‘the Soviet Republic,’ and ‘no to exploitative multinationals,’ I did not follow this trend and I succeeded. Then, the other countries in the region followed my example{{id_6}}.”

4 evidence highlights — click to expand
Cornerstone Move
Export the Model as Influence Multiplier
situational

Deng Xiaoping then sent tens of thousands of Chinese, officials and members of the Communist Party, to Singapore so they could make the most of Singapore’s achievements. China openly used the city-state as a cadre school to train numerous Chinese leaders, for example, by sending Jiang Zemin as early as 1980, who was the Vice President of the Commission for Foreign Investments and later the Mayor of Shanghai, to eventually become the head of state in 1993 and Deng Xiaoping’s successor. From 1985 to the 1990s, the Chinese government did not hesitate to recruit Dr. Goh Keng Swee, one of Lee Kuan Yew’s lieutenants and often considered the architect of Singapore’s economic development, as an economic advisor.

4 evidence highlights — click to expand
Signature MovesHow they operate & think
Signature Move
Civil Servant Pay Tracks Private Sector Pain
situational
Pressed by a question I had asked about the composition of the Prime Minister’s bonuses, he replied by explaining that in Singapore, when the economy shrinks, it is logical for civil servant bonuses to decrease to protect the private sector, which is the most exposed. A concept radically opposed to ours and worth contemplating.
2 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Safety Net Without Dependency Trap
situational
If Lee Kuan Yew built a model of solidarity that is healthily funded, presented as an example to follow by the American Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, he deliberately distances himself from our European social model, which is doomed to disappear, particularly due to Asian competition. Worse still, he believes that the welfare state has something pernicious: it demotivates those who work and encourages mass dependency.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Observations Override Ideology Every Time
situational
Ideology never blinded him. On the contrary, his ability to decipher reality, to see it as it is, has always been one of his constants. Very often, he bases his opinions on his observations. Moreover, he regularly begins his sentences with the expression “according to my observations.” And when his observations differ from what he thinks, then he changes his way of thinking.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Detail to Doctrine — Incident First, Principle Second
situational
He was both concrete and abstract at the same time, loved to start from the detail and move to the general. I heard him introduce his concept of secularity starting from an incident: a marriage between Singaporeans annulled by a Malay imam.
3 evidence highlights
More Insights
Identity & Culture
Competition as Survival Doctrine
situational
If society is not competitive, it is destined to disappear.
3 evidence highlights
In 2 books
Decision Framework
Ideals Subordinate to Wealth-Creation Laws
situational
Lee Kuan Yew never ceased to reflect on his actions regarding economic development, education, political science, culture, geopolitics, and ethnic issues. This intellectual has always read extensively on all these subjects to renew himself. He is characterized above all by the pragmatism and adaptability of his intelligence: he always knew how to differentiate between his ideals and what was possible to achieve, for example, between his socialist aspirations and the capitalist laws of wealth creation.
2 evidence highlights
Operating Principle
Meritocracy Over Electoral Democracy
situational
Lee Kuan Yew emphasizes that the purpose of a political system is not to organize elections but to produce good government. In other words, those in positions of responsibility should be the most competent and of impeccable honesty.
2 evidence highlights
Strategic Pattern
Shorten the Learning Process
situational
Lee Kuan Yew sought to create the best possible conditions to encourage them to settle in Singapore: quality workforce and infrastructure, wage limitation, stable legal framework, regulated strike rights, etc. Lee Kuan Yew called this method “shortening the learning process.”
2 evidence highlights
In Their Own Words

If, after trying several solutions, I discover that a certain approach works, then I extract the underlying principle of the chosen solution.

Lee Kuan Yew explaining his pragmatic method of governance — testing first, theorizing after.

I do not work on a theory. I am interested in what works. In the face of a difficulty, major problem, or an array of contradictory facts, I review what alternatives I have if the solution I propose does not work. I choose a measure that offers a strong probability of success, but if that fails, I have other options. I never find myself at an impasse.

Lee Kuan Yew describing his decision-making process — always maintaining fallback options.

In the sixties, seventies, eighties, during the time of trendy and conformist theories held by third-world leaders influenced by the slogans 'socialism,' 'communism,' 'the Soviet Republic,' and 'no to exploitative multinationals,' I did not follow this trend and I succeeded. Then, the other countries in the region followed my example.

Lee Kuan Yew on his decision to welcome multinationals when every other developing nation rejected them.

Seek truth from facts.

Lee Kuan Yew's distillation of his governing philosophy into its simplest form.

Continue Reading
Related Books
Apple in China
Patrick McGee

Why linked: Shares Singapore, China, and Deng Xiaoping.

Michelin: A Century of Secrets
Alain Jemain

Why linked: Shares General de Gaulle, Communist Party, and IBM.

Anton Rupert
Ebbe Dommisse

Why linked: Shares Singapore and China.

How to Make a Few Billion Dollars
Brad Jacobs

Why linked: Shares China and India.

Key People
Lee Kuan Yew
Person

Primary figure in this dossier arc (19 mentions).

Deng Xiaoping
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (6 mentions).

Murat Lama
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (3 mentions).

General de Gaulle
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (1 mentions).

Gerhard Schroeder
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (1 mentions).

Key Entities
Raw Highlights
Competition as Survival Doctrine (1 highlight)

If society is not competitive, it is destined to disappear.

Civil Servant Pay Tracks Private Sector Pain (1 highlight)

Pressed by a question I had asked about the composition of the Prime Minister’s bonuses, he replied by explaining that in Singapore, when the economy shrinks, it is logical for civil servant bonuses to decrease to protect the private sector, which is the most exposed. A concept radically opposed to ours and worth contemplating.

Ideals Subordinate to Wealth-Creation Laws (1 highlight)

Lee Kuan Yew never ceased to reflect on his actions regarding economic development, education, political science, culture, geopolitics, and ethnic issues. This intellectual has always read extensively on all these subjects to renew himself. He is characterized above all by the pragmatism and adaptability of his intelligence: he always knew how to differentiate between his ideals and what was possible to achieve, for example, between his socialist aspirations and the capitalist laws of wealth creation.

Safety Net Without Dependency Trap (1 highlight)

If Lee Kuan Yew built a model of solidarity that is healthily funded, presented as an example to follow by the American Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, he deliberately distances himself from our European social model, which is doomed to disappear, particularly due to Asian competition. Worse still, he believes that the welfare state has something pernicious: it demotivates those who work and encourages mass dependency.

Invert the Third-World Playbook (1 highlight)

Lee Kuan Yew literally invented industrial outsourcing aimed at reducing production costs, with such a significant impact both on third-world development and on the deindustrialization of Western countries: “In the sixties, seventies, eighties, during the time of trendy and conformist theories held by third-world leaders influenced by the slogans ‘socialism,’ ‘communism,’ ‘the Soviet Republic,’ and ‘no to exploitative multinationals,’ I did not follow this trend and I succeeded. Then, the other countries in the region followed my example{{id_6}}.”

Observations Override Ideology Every Time (1 highlight)

Ideology never blinded him. On the contrary, his ability to decipher reality, to see it as it is, has always been one of his constants. Very often, he bases his opinions on his observations. Moreover, he regularly begins his sentences with the expression “according to my observations.” And when his observations differ from what he thinks, then he changes his way of thinking.

Export the Model as Influence Multiplier (1 highlight)

Deng Xiaoping then sent tens of thousands of Chinese, officials and members of the Communist Party, to Singapore so they could make the most of Singapore’s achievements. China openly used the city-state as a cadre school to train numerous Chinese leaders, for example, by sending Jiang Zemin as early as 1980, who was the Vice President of the Commission for Foreign Investments and later the Mayor of Shanghai, to eventually become the head of state in 1993 and Deng Xiaoping’s successor. From 1985 to the 1990s, the Chinese government did not hesitate to recruit Dr. Goh Keng Swee, one of Lee Kuan Yew’s lieutenants and often considered the architect of Singapore’s economic development, as an economic advisor.

Meritocracy Over Electoral Democracy (1 highlight)

Lee Kuan Yew emphasizes that the purpose of a political system is not to organize elections but to produce good government. In other words, those in positions of responsibility should be the most competent and of impeccable honesty.

Shorten the Learning Process (1 highlight)

Lee Kuan Yew sought to create the best possible conditions to encourage them to settle in Singapore: quality workforce and infrastructure, wage limitation, stable legal framework, regulated strike rights, etc. Lee Kuan Yew called this method “shortening the learning process.”

Detail to Doctrine — Incident First, Principle Second (1 highlight)

He was both concrete and abstract at the same time, loved to start from the detail and move to the general. I heard him introduce his concept of secularity starting from an incident: a marriage between Singaporeans annulled by a Malay imam.

Other highlights (13)

General de Gaulle liked to say that “behind Alexander was silhouetted Aristotle.” One is tempted to think that Lee Kwan Yew is both Alexander and Aristotle (or rather the Aristotelian version of Confucius!).

They do not speak of equality; they know it is not of this world. They expect a lot from the best without demotivating them by taking the fruits of their efforts, as the country needs them too much in this time of intense competition!

However, it is imperative to ensure a safety net for those who are unable to face the competition, allowing them to live with dignity. This is the condition for social harmony.

Despite everything, one cannot help but see astonishing convergences with the German model and its Rhineland capitalism associated with the demanding solidarity developed by Gerhard Schroeder. These traits are also found in every Swiss canton. Their prosperity is enabled by an extraordinary industrial fabric open to the world, but they know that the world is dangerous. Under these conditions, one must be united and work hard, very hard! (The Swiss recently rejected the fifth week of paid vacation, arguing that the rise of the Swiss franc prohibited them from working less.)

First, he invented in the sixties a new mode of economic development by doing exactly the opposite of all other member countries, like Singapore, of the non-aligned movement. These countries were taking protective measures against multinationals, considered as “supporters of Western imperialism.” For example, India not only shut the door to Coca-Cola but also to IBM, which delayed the development of the Indian software industry.

The following year, in 1979, Deng Xiaoping recounted his trip to Singapore and what he had learned for China: “I went to Singapore to learn how they use foreign capital. Singapore allows foreigners to set up factories on its territory and benefits from this in at least three ways: firstly, foreign companies pay the state 35% of their net profits in taxes; secondly, labor incomes go to the workers; finally, this approach has energized their service industries and local incomes.” And he concluded: “My opinion is that from now on, when we study economic and financial problems, our starting point must be how to make the best use of foreign capital, and how to excel in this area{{id_9}}.”

Deng Xiaoping did not want to follow this path, which he considered too dangerous for the country’s stability. This is why he decided to suppress the Tiananmen Square protests in June 1989. However, China had to find an effective alternative. Only one leader proposed another proven path. This uniqueness was clearly perceived at the time, for example by Samuel Huntington when he wrote in 1997: “Apart from the special case of oil-rich Gulf States, all the wealthiest countries, except for Singapore, are democratic.”

Chinese path was found by Deng; it is none other than the one professed and implemented by Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore: an authoritarian and meritocratic republic, an interventionist and social state managed by an elite serving the general interest within the framework of a market economy.

Deng Xiaoping declared: “Singapore enjoys good social order, the city is well managed […]. We should take advantage of their experience and why not do better than them.”

Lee Kuan Yew recalls the instructions given by Deng Xiaoping during this trip: “Open up, learn from the rest of the world and, most importantly, learn from Singapore, for their good governance and discipline.”

Lee Kuan Yew was able to apply a much more rational method. To solve a problem, he begins by considering all possible solutions: “I do not work on a theory.” “I am interested in what works.” “In the face of a difficulty, major problem, or an array of contradictory facts, I review what alternatives I have if the solution I propose does not work. I choose a measure that offers a strong probability of success, but if that fails, I have other options. I never find myself at an impasse.”

options: “If, after trying several solutions, I discover that a certain approach works, then I extract the underlying principle of the chosen solution.”

“Seek truth from facts.”