PRIME MOVERS
Autobiography of Morris Chang: Volume 1, 1931-1964

Autobiography of Morris Chang: Volume 1, 1931-1964

張忠謀

86 highlights · 15 concepts · 93 entities · 3 cornerstones · 4 signatures

Context & Bio

Taiwanese-American semiconductor pioneer who founded TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), creating the pure-play foundry model that reshaped the global chip industry.

Era1931-1964: War-torn China, post-WWII American industrial dominance, birth of the semiconductor industry from Bell Labs' 1948 transistor invention through the Warring States era of dozens of competing chip companies.ScaleFounded TSMC, the world's largest semiconductor foundry (market cap exceeding $800B), which manufactures chips for Apple, Nvidia, AMD, and most of the world's advanced processors. Entered semiconductors at age 24 when the industry was only 3 years old.
Ask This Book
86 highlights
Cornerstone MovesHow they build businesses
Cornerstone Move
Fix the Process on the Factory Floor First
situational

After observing this soldering work for a few days, I felt it was not a very good technique, because the soldering tool’s temperature was very high and the operators’ experience and skill levels varied. Some new operators had to keep the soldering tool in contact with the electrode for quite a long time before completing the soldering, and the high temperature of the soldering tool was very likely to affect the chemical structure inside the transistor as a result.

3 evidence highlights — click to expand
Cornerstone Move
Fury Into Reverse-Logic Career Bets
situational

Having “outsmarted myself” like that—if it were me now, I might just laugh it off, accept it, and without another word still go to Ford. But the young, hot-blooded me became furious from embarrassment. And in that fury, I began to “think in reverse.” I was confident about the work at Ford, but was I unwilling to take a risk and go to Sylvania to do something I wasn’t confident about? I thought I got along very well with the supervisor at Ford, but judging only from the personnel manager’s coldness, how unreliable was that fleeting impression! I thought Ford was large and my career would be secure, but semiconductor development might be fast and perhaps would give me more opportunities to grow. Turning it over again and again for a few days while the humiliation was still fresh, I actually arrived at a conclusion that would have been impossible a few days earlier: go to Sylvania!

3 evidence highlights — click to expand
Cornerstone Move
Self-Teach Past the Experts Then Publish
situational

Self-studying semiconductors, gradually standing out At the same time, I began to teach myself semiconductors. My textbook was Shockley’s (one of the inventors of the transistor and a Nobel Prize winner) classic work, Electrons and Holes in Semiconductors. For a beginner, this is quite a difficult textbook. The feeling of first reading Homer’s epic poems when I had just arrived in the United States six years earlier appeared once again.

4 evidence highlights — click to expand
Signature MovesHow they operate & think
Signature Move
One Week Maximum on Psychological Setbacks
situational
Fortunately, after being remolded in life, Mr. Morris Chang possessed the confidence and strength to avoid these graves large and small. He failed the doctoral qualifying examinations twice in 1954 and 1955, suffering a great blow, but he spent only one week to get past the psychological trap. He avoided the path that Chinese overseas students would inevitably take—transferring schools to pursue a doctorate again, and then spending a lifetime engaged in teaching and research—and instead raised his head and went to find a job himself. He has a passage in his autobiography that is said with great flavor.
2 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Never Accept the Chinese Overseas Default Path
situational
Although Chinese people believed that in America the only way forward was teaching and research, who said I could not be a pioneer and blaze another trail? After rejecting transferring to another school for a PhD, the remaining choice—for me the only choice—was: to find a job.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Seek the Youngest Hungriest Company
situational
And what a vigorous company Texas Instruments was! Employees seemed to walk a bit faster than at Sylvania, and their backs seemed a bit straighter too. “Tired” was practically an adjective you never heard. At that time, the standard workweek in the United States was forty hours, but TI’s working hours were at least fifty; it was common for someone to bring a canvas cot to work in the morning, planning to sleep in the office at night. Working on Saturday mornings was an unwritten rule, and except for the most junior employees, no one received overtime pay for extended hours. I also discovered that within the company, “failure” was never accepted; “setbacks” could be understood, even sympathized with. But the person who suffered a setback had to pull themselves together and start again; if there was another setback, start again—until success. I also found that this was a very talkative company, where no one was afraid to voice opinions, even if some were very naive. In my first few months on the job, several times the production line’s yield suddenly dropped or failed to rise as expected; not only engineers and technicians, but even line operators would offer suggestions—and do so enthusiastically. Their suggestions were not necessarily adopted, but even after repeatedly hitting a wall, they would still continue to express their views.
3 evidence highlights
Signature Move
Sponge Year Before Specialization
situational
Just as the literary giant Hemingway described Paris as “a moveable feast,” I describe my year at Harvard the same way. After that, I went through various stages—MIT, employment, entering Stanford for a Ph.D., and working at Texas Instruments—but no matter where I went or what I did, I carried this “feast” with me and continually enjoyed the knowledge, interests, and insights that this “feast” gave me. Even decades later, when I returned to Taiwan, although changes in time and place made it feel as if I were in another world, this “feast” still did not lose its freshness. It was as though I were still immersed in a rich, ever-changing, refined, and captivating atmosphere.
3 evidence highlights
More Insights
Identity & Culture
Seven Months That Divide a Life
situational
Looking back many years later, those seven months in Hong Kong at the age of eighteen were an important dividing line in my life. My old world collapsed as the mainland changed hands, and a new world was waiting to be built. Before Hong Kong, like millions of young people my age, I focused on preparing to study and work in China; after Hong Kong, I took the first step toward living abroad for the long term. Before Hong Kong, I wanted to go into business; after Hong Kong, I began a lifelong career in technology. Before Hong Kong, my parents were my whole world, and I relied on them for everything; after Hong Kong, I discovered that my parents could no longer help me, and I could only rely on myself.
2 evidence highlights
Strategic Pattern
Technological Inflection Points Level the Field
situational
Of course, in earlier business history there were quite a few successful examples of “the small taking on the big,” but those successes were achieved only after long struggles, and most were cases where big companies made serious mistakes that gave small companies opportunities. TI’s large competitors, however, had not made serious mistakes, yet TI surpassed them in only a few short years. Why was this? Ultimately, the pace of technological progress clearly accelerated after World War II, and “technological inflection points” emerged one after another. When each “technological inflection point” appears, big companies are not necessarily stronger than small ones; small and big companies have almost equal opportunities. Over the past decades, cases of small companies outperforming big companies have become too numerous to count. The most famous example in the past ten-plus years is Microsoft beating IBM. But as far as I know, TI established the earliest model.
3 evidence highlights
Identity & Culture
Products of Tradition Yet Disloyal Subjects
situational
Jung said that not everyone living in modern times can be called a “modern person.” True modern people are very few; they stand neither in yesterday nor in tomorrow, but on the bridge from yesterday to tomorrow. A full awareness of this transitional state makes them simultaneously experience loneliness, because the broad masses are always unconsciously shrouded in the historical fog, and some even put on a pseudo-modern mask over a regressive essence. Only true modern people know that they are products of tradition and yet disloyal subjects of tradition; they know well the deficiencies of tradition and think day and night of using marginal creation to make up for them, but in their hearts they also understand that today’s creation will soon be surpassed, and therefore they cannot help but constantly fall into fear and anxiety. Jung hoped that people could, through the appearances of various social events, decipher the modern age from psychological and spiritual levels.
3 evidence highlights
Identity & Culture
Setback Culture Not Failure Culture
situational
And what a vigorous company Texas Instruments was! Employees seemed to walk a bit faster than at Sylvania, and their backs seemed a bit straighter too. “Tired” was practically an adjective you never heard. At that time, the standard workweek in the United States was forty hours, but TI’s working hours were at least fifty; it was common for someone to bring a canvas cot to work in the morning, planning to sleep in the office at night. Working on Saturday mornings was an unwritten rule, and except for the most junior employees, no one received overtime pay for extended hours. I also discovered that within the company, “failure” was never accepted; “setbacks” could be understood, even sympathized with. But the person who suffered a setback had to pull themselves together and start again; if there was another setback, start again—until success. I also found that this was a very talkative company, where no one was afraid to voice opinions, even if some were very naive. In my first few months on the job, several times the production line’s yield suddenly dropped or failed to rise as expected; not only engineers and technicians, but even line operators would offer suggestions—and do so enthusiastically. Their suggestions were not necessarily adopted, but even after repeatedly hitting a wall, they would still continue to express their views.
2 evidence highlights
Competitive Advantage
Wartime Childhood as Resilience Forge
situational
Before I turned eighteen, I had already fled disaster three times, lived in six cities (Ningbo, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Chongqing, Shanghai), and changed schools ten times. I had experienced gunfire (Hong Kong) and bombings (Guangzhou, Chongqing), and crossed battle lines (from Shanghai to Chongqing). I had a carefree childhood (Hong Kong), and also tasted the impassioned life of a middle school student during the War of Resistance (Chongqing); still more, I tasted the sorrow of leaving home and country, not knowing when I would return (from Hong Kong to the United States).
3 evidence highlights
Operating Principle
Master Professors Make Profound Things Simple
situational
In the eyes of the masters, the content and level of undergraduate—and even master’s—teaching materials were quite basic, but they all had the ability to “make profound things simple,” making it easy for students to understand. This ability to “make profound things simple” seems to be something only those who thoroughly understand a topic can possess.
3 evidence highlights
Decision Framework
One Dollar More Changed Everything
situational
The fourth was a company whose name I had heard, but the unit that wanted to hire me was opening up an industry I knew nothing about. This company was “Sylvania,” famous for light bulbs, televisions, radios, and vacuum tubes; the industry they wanted to develop was transistors made with semiconductors as the material. In mechanical engineering courses I had heard of “semiconductors,” but other than the name I knew nothing. As for “transistors,” I had not even heard the name. Then how did I go to Sylvania to apply for a job? It was entirely because of an offhand remark by my third uncle. In the period when I had failed the doctoral exam and was at a loss and unsure what to do, one day I went to my third uncle’s home, and he suddenly said: “A few days ago a Chinese friend came to see me and said he recently joined Sylvania working on transistors, and he said there are several Chinese people there. You might as well go and give it a try.” So I called Sylvania, and a few days later I went for an interview. The executive who interviewed me was the director of the semiconductor laboratory, a slightly chubby middle-aged American, very imposing, and he also seemed to know semiconductors well (later I learned that at that time people who understood semiconductors were as rare as phoenix feathers and unicorn horns, and this director was not among them). He told me that his task was to turn the “laboratory” into a large factory, and in the process the manufacturing process would certainly need to be automated. And I was a mechanical engineering master’s graduate and had studied “automatic control,” which might be of some help to automation. With that one conversation, it neither aroused much interest in me nor stirred much hope. However, unexpectedly, the offer letter came—and the monthly salary was even one dollar higher than Ford’s: four hundred eighty dollars.
2 evidence highlights
Strategic Pattern
Semiconductor Optimism as Naming Doctrine
situational
Then why do we call this industry the “semiconductor industry,” and not the “transistor industry”? In fact, in the 1950s the semiconductor industry was almost the same as the transistor industry, and indeed some people called it the transistor industry, but most practitioners still called it the semiconductor industry. Why? Because of technological optimism! Most of the industry believed that the transistor would not be the only invention based on semiconductors—there must be others. Sure enough, semiconductor lamps and semiconductor lasers followed one after another, and more importantly, the integrated circuit was invented in 1958. Today, integrated circuits already account for 85% of the semiconductor industry. The transistor, which dominated the scene forty years ago, accounts for only 5% of semiconductors.
2 evidence highlights
In Their Own Words

Life's turning points can sometimes be so unpredictable! A short phone call, plus a young man's momentary impulse, ended up binding me to semiconductors for a lifetime!

Chang reflecting on the chance phone call to Sylvania that launched his semiconductor career.

It seems enthusiasm and hard work still aren't enough.

The words of two young Sylvania engineers to Chang when he had to inform them of their layoff—a moment he called the hardest work of his life.

Just as the literary giant Hemingway described Paris as 'a moveable feast,' I describe my year at Harvard the same way. After that, I went through various stages—MIT, employment, entering Stanford for a Ph.D., and working at Texas Instruments—but no matter where I went or what I did, I carried this 'feast' with me and continually enjoyed the knowledge, interests, and insights that this 'feast' gave me.

Chang on how his single year at Harvard—reading widely, absorbing Western culture—nourished his entire subsequent career.

People busy doing things rarely have time to think about the past, but in the quiet of the night, when I occasionally look back, what I miss most is not the period after thirty-three, when my career began to achieve some success, but rather the first half of my life.

Chang opening his autobiography, valuing his formative years over his years of achievement.

Before Hong Kong, my parents were my whole world, and I relied on them for everything; after Hong Kong, I discovered that my parents could no longer help me, and I could only rely on myself.

Chang on the seven months in Hong Kong at age eighteen that divided his life—from dependent youth to self-reliant adult.

Mistakes & Lessons
Mechanical Engineering Mismatch

Broad employability logic ('machines are used everywhere') can trap you in the wrong field—follow the subject that genuinely excites you.

Sylvania's Comfortable Decline

Innovation-resistant organizations destroy the people inside them; enthusiasm and hard work aren't enough if leadership stagnates.

Twice-Failed PhD Qualifying Exams

A closed academic door can be the best career redirect—spend one week grieving, then pivot entirely.

Continue Reading
Related Books
Apple in China
Patrick McGee

Why linked: Shares Texas Instruments, Harvard, and Shanghai.

Born to Be Wired
John Malone

Why linked: Shares Bell Labs, IBM, and Shakespeare.

The Outsiders_ Eight Unconventional CEOs and Their Radically Rational Blueprint for Success
Thorndike, William N.

Why linked: Shares Intel, United States, and IBM.

Who Knew
Barry Diller

Why linked: Shares United States, RCA, and Microsoft.

Son's Square Law (translated)
Hidenori Itagaki

Why linked: Shares Intel, University of California, Berkeley, and Microsoft.

Key People
Morris Chang
Person

Primary figure in this dossier arc (34 mentions).

Hemingway
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (5 mentions).

Zhang Zhongmou
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (4 mentions).

Jung
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (2 mentions).

Teal
Person

Recurring actor in this dossier network (2 mentions).

Key Entities
Raw Highlights
Seven Months That Divide a Life (1 highlight)

Looking back many years later, those seven months in Hong Kong at the age of eighteen were an important dividing line in my life. My old world collapsed as the mainland changed hands, and a new world was waiting to be built. Before Hong Kong, like millions of young people my age, I focused on preparing to study and work in China; after Hong Kong, I took the first step toward living abroad for the long term. Before Hong Kong, I wanted to go into business; after Hong Kong, I began a lifelong career in technology. Before Hong Kong, my parents were my whole world, and I relied on them for everything; after Hong Kong, I discovered that my parents could no longer help me, and I could only rely on myself.

Fury Into Reverse-Logic Career Bets (1 highlight)

Having “outsmarted myself” like that—if it were me now, I might just laugh it off, accept it, and without another word still go to Ford. But the young, hot-blooded me became furious from embarrassment. And in that fury, I began to “think in reverse.” I was confident about the work at Ford, but was I unwilling to take a risk and go to Sylvania to do something I wasn’t confident about? I thought I got along very well with the supervisor at Ford, but judging only from the personnel manager’s coldness, how unreliable was that fleeting impression! I thought Ford was large and my career would be secure, but semiconductor development might be fast and perhaps would give me more opportunities to grow. Turning it over again and again for a few days while the humiliation was still fresh, I actually arrived at a conclusion that would have been impossible a few days earlier: go to Sylvania!

Wartime Childhood as Resilience Forge (1 highlight)

Before I turned eighteen, I had already fled disaster three times, lived in six cities (Ningbo, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Chongqing, Shanghai), and changed schools ten times. I had experienced gunfire (Hong Kong) and bombings (Guangzhou, Chongqing), and crossed battle lines (from Shanghai to Chongqing). I had a carefree childhood (Hong Kong), and also tasted the impassioned life of a middle school student during the War of Resistance (Chongqing); still more, I tasted the sorrow of leaving home and country, not knowing when I would return (from Hong Kong to the United States).

Never Accept the Chinese Overseas Default Path (1 highlight)

Although Chinese people believed that in America the only way forward was teaching and research, who said I could not be a pioneer and blaze another trail? After rejecting transferring to another school for a PhD, the remaining choice—for me the only choice—was: to find a job.

Master Professors Make Profound Things Simple (1 highlight)

In the eyes of the masters, the content and level of undergraduate—and even master’s—teaching materials were quite basic, but they all had the ability to “make profound things simple,” making it easy for students to understand. This ability to “make profound things simple” seems to be something only those who thoroughly understand a topic can possess.

One Dollar More Changed Everything (1 highlight)

The fourth was a company whose name I had heard, but the unit that wanted to hire me was opening up an industry I knew nothing about. This company was “Sylvania,” famous for light bulbs, televisions, radios, and vacuum tubes; the industry they wanted to develop was transistors made with semiconductors as the material. In mechanical engineering courses I had heard of “semiconductors,” but other than the name I knew nothing. As for “transistors,” I had not even heard the name. Then how did I go to Sylvania to apply for a job? It was entirely because of an offhand remark by my third uncle. In the period when I had failed the doctoral exam and was at a loss and unsure what to do, one day I went to my third uncle’s home, and he suddenly said: “A few days ago a Chinese friend came to see me and said he recently joined Sylvania working on transistors, and he said there are several Chinese people there. You might as well go and give it a try.” So I called Sylvania, and a few days later I went for an interview. The executive who interviewed me was the director of the semiconductor laboratory, a slightly chubby middle-aged American, very imposing, and he also seemed to know semiconductors well (later I learned that at that time people who understood semiconductors were as rare as phoenix feathers and unicorn horns, and this director was not among them). He told me that his task was to turn the “laboratory” into a large factory, and in the process the manufacturing process would certainly need to be automated. And I was a mechanical engineering master’s graduate and had studied “automatic control,” which might be of some help to automation. With that one conversation, it neither aroused much interest in me nor stirred much hope. However, unexpectedly, the offer letter came—and the monthly salary was even one dollar higher than Ford’s: four hundred eighty dollars.

Semiconductor Optimism as Naming Doctrine (1 highlight)

Then why do we call this industry the “semiconductor industry,” and not the “transistor industry”? In fact, in the 1950s the semiconductor industry was almost the same as the transistor industry, and indeed some people called it the transistor industry, but most practitioners still called it the semiconductor industry. Why? Because of technological optimism! Most of the industry believed that the transistor would not be the only invention based on semiconductors—there must be others. Sure enough, semiconductor lamps and semiconductor lasers followed one after another, and more importantly, the integrated circuit was invented in 1958. Today, integrated circuits already account for 85% of the semiconductor industry. The transistor, which dominated the scene forty years ago, accounts for only 5% of semiconductors.

Sponge Year Before Specialization (1 highlight)

Just as the literary giant Hemingway described Paris as “a moveable feast,” I describe my year at Harvard the same way. After that, I went through various stages—MIT, employment, entering Stanford for a Ph.D., and working at Texas Instruments—but no matter where I went or what I did, I carried this “feast” with me and continually enjoyed the knowledge, interests, and insights that this “feast” gave me. Even decades later, when I returned to Taiwan, although changes in time and place made it feel as if I were in another world, this “feast” still did not lose its freshness. It was as though I were still immersed in a rich, ever-changing, refined, and captivating atmosphere.

Other highlights (32)

People busy doing things rarely have time to think about the past, but in the quiet of the night, when I occasionally look back, what I miss most is not the period after thirty-three, when my career began to achieve some success, but rather the first half of my life.

At eighteen I entered Harvard University in the United States. Among more than a thousand classmates with blue eyes, I was the only Chinese. For a whole year I had only American friends, used only English, and absorbed Western culture like a sponge. Even now, several decades later, that year at Harvard remains the most unforgettable and most exciting year of my life.

At nineteen I entered the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where I learned my livelihood skills at the highest institution

At twenty-four I entered the semiconductor industry; at that time the semiconductor industry itself was only three years old.

Brother Yu Youcheng invited me to write a preface for his new book, “I See Intel” (published by CommonWealth Publishing) [1]. He said, “About two thousand words will

Just then, one night I reopened the Hemingway collected works [2] that I loved, and turned to his short story “The Snows of Kilimanjaro.” The protagonist is a writer who develops gangrene at the foot of Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, cannot move, and waits to die while gazing at the snow-covered peak. The following are his hazy thoughts before death: Now he could never write the stories, the ones he had saved up to write when he could write them better. Maybe at least he had not written them badly. Maybe he would never be able to write them any better, and that was why he had been putting off writing them. In any case, everything was unknown now.

Yingdai’er is Intel (Intel), *My View of Yingdai’er*, 1995, Commonwealth Publishing.

From Xuzhou to Luoyang, we used every kind of transportation we could: when we could take a truck we took a truck; when there were rickshaws or tricycles we took rickshaws or tricycles; when there were no vehicles at all we walked. When crossing the front line, we of course chose a section where there was no fighting, but there was absolutely no guarantee that there would not be gunfire or artillery; that section was entirely on foot. The journey from Xuzhou to Luoyang took several days. Each night we stayed either in small inns, or in small shops, or in temples. During wartime, in places close to the front line, troops often came to inspect travelers. I remember that one night, the ones who came to inspect us turned out to be the Nationalist army; for the first time since leaving Shanghai, smiles appeared on my parents’ faces!

In late March 1943, we set out from Shanghai. At the time of departure we only knew the general route; as for how long the whole journey would take, what means of transportation we would use, and where we would stay along the way, we had only incomplete and uncertain information that my father had inquired about. The first leg of the trip was the most reliable: taking a train to Nanjing, then transferring to a train to Xuzhou. Xuzhou was in Japanese hands at that time, but it was already very close to the front line where the Chinese and Japanese forces were fighting. After passing Xuzhou, the goal was Luoyang. Luoyang was in Chinese hands, so from Xuzhou to Luoyang we had to cross the battle line.

that time I deeply understood the truth of “The road to Shu is hard, harder than climbing to the blue sky,”

Over the past several decades of life, I have already traveled a million miles, but no matter how comfortable or even luxurious travel in recent years has been, the journey I miss the most, the one that has the greatest meaning for me, and the one that left the deepest impression in my mind, is still the trek from Shanghai to Chongqing when I was eleven.

My mother decided to let me attend Nankai’s summer class: on the one hand I could review my schoolwork, and on the other hand there was also the chance of doing well and being recommended. Nankai’s rule was that all students had to live on campus. This was based on practical considerations: although Shapingba was only twenty or thirty kilometers from Chongqing, transportation was inconvenient at the time, and commuting was impossible for the vast majority of students. But setting practical considerations aside, requiring students to live on campus was actually a very good educational policy. In my experience, the periods when I learned the fastest, felt the happiest, and made the most good friends were all periods when I lived in the school dormitory.

After my father arrived in Hong Kong, he very firmly believed that I must study science and engineering so that after graduation I could make a living. Where could I go to study science and engineering? At that time Hong Kong had only one university, the University of Hong Kong; not only were science and engineering not strong there, but the entire school was not very highly regarded. Forced into it, my father believed I had only one path: to go to the United States to attend university. He still had the ability to cover my first year’s tuition, fees, and living expenses. As for after one year, it would depend on how things went for him in Hong Kong; and after I had become more accustomed to the American environment, I should be able to apply for scholarships, or work part-time while studying. My mother told me frankly that even my first year’s expenses were already a heavy burden for my father: “Fortunately you are an only son; otherwise we would not have the ability to send you abroad.”

Under these circumstances, my parents decided to send me overseas. My third uncle, Mr. Zhang Sihou, was then a professor at Northeastern University in Boston, and he chose for me to apply to Harvard University. Why choose Harvard? First, Harvard is a world-famous institution; second, Harvard is in Boston, and my third uncle could look after me nearby. But Boston also had another world-famous school, one that specialized in science and engineering: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Why, after my father had clearly told my third uncle that I was going to study science and engineering, did my third uncle still not choose MIT for me? About this, I later asked my third uncle. He smiled and said, “The you I knew was the you at Nankai in Chongqing, when you loved the humanities. Later I heard you wanted to study business. It wasn’t until you got to Hong Kong that I heard you wanted to study science and engineering. I thought you should have time to gradually establish your own interests. Rather than rush you into the very specialized MIT, it would be better to let you have a buffer period at Harvard. Besides, Harvard’s science and engineering are also top-notch—it’s just not as specialized as MIT.”

In 1949, the United States stood at the pinnacle of prestige and authority. Only four years had passed since the end of World War II; it was the most important victorious nation, and also the only country whose homeland had not been destroyed during the war. Militarily, America’s army, navy, and air force had already displayed their might across battlefields around the world during the war, and it was also the only country to possess the atomic bomb. Economically, although its population accounted for only 5% of the world, its gross national product accounted for 40% of the world’s total. The standard of living of the American people at that time was unmatched by any other country: a U.S. worker’s wages for a few months could buy a car, and in two or three years could buy a house. Almost every household had a refrigerator and a washing machine, and many families were also purchasing the rapidly emerging television sets of that era. Employment among married women was still not common, so most families had only one working person, yet even a single salary could enable the whole family to enjoy a fairly comfortable material life.

The freedom of the American people was conditional—it required obeying the law, and the law was quite clear, with little ambiguity, and enforcement was quite strict. For someone like me, a survivor of war who had come through a chaotic era, the rule of law in the United States in 1949 seemed like another world. Of course, there was often crime news in the newspapers, but in the lives of most of the people in the city of Cambridge where I lived, it seemed that no shadow of crime intruded. “No need to bolt the door at night, and nothing left lying on the road would be picked up” truly was a depiction of life at that time.

On the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty in New York Harbor are the following lines of poetry: “Keep your ancient lands, keep your legendary splendor!” She cries out silently, “Give me your tired, poor, fearful people, They want to breathe the air of freedom. Send those who have lost their homes and long endured storms over here, I raise my lamp, Waiting quietly beside this golden gate!” [1]

In that one year at Harvard, the amount and breadth of my reading were something I never again matched later. I read Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Galsworthy, Sinclair Lewis, Jane Austen, Shakespeare, and Shaw; Churchill’s memoirs of World War II; famous speeches by modern American presidents; American history; Wells’s world history; several English books about China; and I also ventured into a few classical giants such as Gibbon’s The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, and even Marx’s Capital. Besides these major works, I subscribed to two newspapers, The New York Times and The Christian Science Monitor published in Boston, as well as Time magazine.

At that time, among the professors in MIT’s mechanical engineering department there were many master-level figures. In applied mechanics there was Den Hartog; in fluid mechanics there was Shapiro; in thermodynamics there were Keenan and Kaye; in materials science there were Orowan and Chao. A few months ago, a vice chancellor from the University of California, Berkeley came to visit me. He was a few years younger than I and also came from mechanical engineering, though not from MIT. When he discovered that I studied mechanical engineering at MIT from 1950 to 1955, we could not help recalling the past. He said that at that time he greatly envied MIT’s faculty and academic standards, and he also agreed that the 1950s truly deserved to be called the golden era of MIT’s mechanical engineering department.

At that time I was “in the mountains without knowing the mountains,” and did not know that I was living in a golden age, but I did have a deep impression of the master-level professors.

The master-level professors’ attitude toward handling questions also left a deep impression on me. American students like to ask questions; the level of questions varies, some are very childish, but some are also quite profound.

Master-level professors never despised any question. They of course answered simple questions quickly; for more difficult questions, they also remained unhurried and composed, thinking while speaking, and at the same time writing on the blackboard the staged conclusions of their thinking. After a few minutes like this, a problem we considered very difficult would be solved by him. If he had not completely figured it out at the time, he would say, “Let me go back and think about it some more, and I’ll tell you in the next class.”

A master is indeed a master—he seems never to be stumped; the harder the question, the more it is an opportunity for him to demonstrate his method of thinking.

Smart students can also learn from it a way to solve problems, and grow through learning under the dual education of “teaching by words” and “teaching by example.”

In my senior year, I once had the idea of transferring to the physics department or the electrical engineering department. Among all the science and engineering courses I had taken, I liked physics and mathematics more. Of course these two sciences are required in the physics department, and the electrical engineering department also takes more of them than mechanical engineering. But I discovered that if I changed majors, I would have to delay graduation by at least one year, perhaps even two. Given the premise of graduating as soon as possible, I gave up that idea.

Just as in my naive thinking before choosing to study mechanical engineering, machines are used everywhere. But places that use machines do not necessarily need mechanical master’s graduates, and the prospects for mechanical engineering graduates are not necessarily better than those of other engineering departments. At that time, America’s rising aircraft industry and enormous automobile manufacturing industry employed large numbers of mechanical engineers; the steel industry and machine tool industry, which had begun to decline, also employed quite a few mechanical engineers.

Life’s turning points can sometimes be so unpredictable! A short phone call, plus a young man’s momentary impulse, ended up binding me to semiconductors for a lifetime!

The characteristics of a semiconductor are exactly as its name suggests: its electrical conductivity lies between that of a conductor (such as metal) and an insulator (such as wood or stone). Semiconductors have another characteristic: their conductivity can be changed by adding “impurities.” Scientists had known of the existence of semiconductors for many years, but did not know how to use them. It wasn’t until 1948 that scientists at Bell Labs, making use of the properties of semiconductors, built the transistor—and everything changed.

The applications of the transistor were immediate and obvious: it was far smaller, far lighter, and consumed far less energy than the vacuum tubes that were already very important at the time, and it would soon eliminate vacuum tubes. Moreover, because transistors are small, light, short, and energy-saving, they can do many things vacuum tubes cannot do—for example, serve as the main components of computers, missiles, satellites, and so on.

In short, once the transistor was invented, its practical importance was recognized by the scientific and technological community. In just a few years, “semiconductor” changed from an academic term into an industry.

Today, many people call Taiwan’s semiconductor industry the integrated-circuit industry. They are not wrong: the overwhelming majority of semiconductor manufacturers’ products are indeed integrated circuits. However, when it comes to the development of technology, I too am an incurable optimist. I firmly believe semiconductors are endlessly profound; integrated circuits are only their embodiment today. One day—perhaps in a few years, perhaps in a few decades—another invention based on semiconductors will appear. So I like this broader term: the semiconductor industry.

The importance of the transistor’s invention was no less than that of the electric light, the telephone, or steam power. The three inventors—Bardeen (John Bardeen), Brattain (Walter Brattain), and Shockley (William Shockley)—also jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1956.